| 400.000 Meters Above Sea Level |
-> german version |
![]() © NASA |
WORLD – SPACE – ARCHITECTURE
11. NOVEMBER 2003, 19.00 |
| Discussion: space as projection space – about architecture
and technology |
|
Links:
|
![]() © Hans Ringhofer |
| 400.000 Meters Above Sea
Level “400.000 m above sea level”: this is the ISS orbit altitude, expressed in a code we are familiar with from our conventional maps and terrestrial geography. In actual fact, the orbit of 400.000 m above sea level – 400 km from our planet’s surface – is no further away from Vienna than Munich, and can be reached within the same time. We simply have to overcome our largely horizontal perception of mobility and be more prepared to integrate the [vertical] z-axis in our perception of ‘world’. After all, the German term for (outer) space – Weltraum - is composed from the words for ‘world’ (Welt) and ‘space’ (Raum). World – Space – Architecture |
SPACE: Einstein taught us that ‘space’ does not exist by itself but can only be seen in relation to ‘time’. Space is an abstract phenomenon we can only perceive via our own physical bodies, as long as we are aware of our physical limits. On Earth this is usually straightforward, we can orient ourselves quite easily by gravitation, light from above, and our built and natural environment, which gives us safety by providing a scale and point of orientation. Architecture means space and time. Weightlessness leaves behind the conventions of orientation and space: The focus is on architecture, on world and space, on the overlaps and intersections between extraterrestrial and terrestrial architecture. We are talking about a technical experiment, as it were, designed to identify areas where the two fields of architecture overlap, but where outer space can also be seen as a preview and projection space of terrestrial architecture. |
![]() © Kaas Oosterhuis |
| |
A space habitat is a completely technologized space, and as such is of vital importance for the survival of its inhabitants. On Earth, technologized spaces are either designed to make us feel comfortable – a feeling strongly stimulated by consumption – and to enhance our perception, or [they] provide the basis future autarkic systems. In a hospital with an intensive care unit, several operating rooms [etc.], technical services are so complex that we cannot define and implement all tasks involved without the help of experts. Terrestrial architecture, as such, is a specialized field of architecture. Humans living and working in space will always be entirely dependent on the technology and architecture of their environment. In the longer term, extreme environments of this kind will be inhabited by humans whose lifestyle will be based on technology. In an environment where the only options are ‘life-or-death’ we will, eventually, have no choice as to whether we will or should accept our genetic modification, synthetic generation or technological enhancement (regarding physical capabilities and perception). |
![]() © NASA |
| After all, our lives will be at stake. In
this situation the need for survival, rather than consumer choice, is
the primary reason and motivation for architects to consider the psychological
and physical situation of the (prospective) inhabitants and strive to
explore new approaches, independent of terrestrial codes and patterns.
But just as Kaas Oosterhuis describes an interactive laboratory based
on the expandable space of his Programmable Space Station, these developments
will simultaneously occur on Earth, or will even influence each other. |
Project ‘Backprojection’by
ESCAPE*spHERE: |
![]() |
| © ESCAPE*spHERE (Barbara Imhof, Sandrine von Klot, Birgit Trenkwalder) |
| The space suit: a close-fitting space, the very essence of a habitat. Experts from various fields, such as chemistry, genetics, biology, engineering or design, are working to develop innovative high-tech fibres that usually see their first large-scale breakthrough in the outdoor or sports fashion industry. Data, software and communications solutions are currently becoming integral parts of new clothing items. This trend is not only relevant for fashion as such - it also allows our environment and the space around us to become increasingly responsive and interactive. Our levels of perception are being multiplied and reinforced at the same time. |